Resume Fraud: What It Is, and What Happens in Australia
By Jamison Barry
Yes, it can be a crime. That is the question people actually search, and most pages answer it with a shrug.
In Victoria, section 82 of the Crimes Act 1958 reads: “A person who by any deception dishonestly obtains for himself or another any financial advantage is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).” A salary is a financial advantage. Every state has an equivalent provision.
Whether a prosecution follows is a different question, and mostly it does not. But two Australians found out that it can.
In 2014 Andrew Jeffrey Flanagan was appointed General Manager Strategy and Business Development at Myer on a package reported at $400,000. He had claimed experience at companies he had never worked for, and had a friend pose as a referee — impersonating, among others, the chief executive of Bendigo Health.
He lasted one day. A representative of a company he had falsely claimed to work for contacted Myer and told them.
He later pleaded guilty in the Victorian County Court to one count of attempting to obtain a financial advantage by deception and three further counts of obtaining a financial advantage by deception — the three relating to other employers. He received a three-year community corrections order with 400 hours of unpaid work.
The more serious case. In 2017 Veronica Hilda Theriault was appointed chief information officer in the South Australian Department of the Premier and Cabinet, a role the ABC reported at $270,000.
She fabricated her education and work history. Her brother posed as a former supervisor to give a reference. She impersonated a second referee herself. She falsified a pay slip to negotiate a higher salary and forged a fitness-for-work letter from a doctor. Her LinkedIn profile used a photograph of the model Kate Upton.
She was employed for about a month and was paid roughly $33,000 before being terminated. In December 2019 the District Court convicted her of deception, dishonestly dealing with documents and abuse of public office, and sentenced her to 25 months’ imprisonment with a 12-month non-parole period.
Neither of them was caught by a background-check company. Both were caught by someone who picked up a phone.
That is the pattern. The checks that find fabrication are ordinary:
This is the part that matters to most people reading, because almost nobody is inventing a degree. They are wondering how far they can push.
The line is not about emphasis. Emphasis is the job — you are entitled to lead with your strongest work, describe scope in its best honest light, and leave off the roles that no longer help. None of that is deception.
The line is about assertions of fact that a third party could contradict. A title you did not hold. A qualification you did not complete. Dates that close a gap that existed. A number you cannot show the working for. Those are the things a referee call or a transcript check turns up, and they are the things that convert an awkward conversation into a terminated contract.
A worked example we deal with regularly. Someone completed two years of a degree and never finished. Claiming the degree is fraud. Listing the units completed — “Completed four units toward a Bachelor of Commerce, including financial accounting” — is accurate, verifiable, and does most of the same work. There is almost always a true version of the thing you were tempted to overstate, and it is usually more persuasive because it survives scrutiny.
Two things worth knowing. Dismissal does not require a conviction: a material misrepresentation that induced the employment is generally grounds for termination on its own, whatever the police do or do not do. And it does not expire — Theriault’s CV was checked after she started, not before.
If something in a current document is not true, the cheapest moment to fix it is before anyone asks.
This page describes how these matters have been dealt with in reported Australian cases. It is not legal advice, and if you are facing a specific situation you should speak to a lawyer.
Sources

